Volume 65 December - February Volume 64 September - November Volume 63 June - August Volume 62 March - May Volume 61 December - February Volume 60 September - November Volume 59 February - August Volume 58 March - May Volume 57 January - February Volume 56 August - October Volume 55 May - July Volume 54 February - April Volume 53 December - January Volume 52 September - November Volume 51 June - August Volume 50 April - May May , Issue April , Issue 1. Volume 49 January - March Volume 48 October - December Volume 47 July - September Volume 46 April - June Volume 45 January - October October , Issue 3 January , Issue Volume 44 September - December Volume 43 June - August Volume 42 March - May Volume 41 December - February Volume 40 August - November Volume 39 April - July Volume 38 January - March Volume 37 February - November Volume 36 June - August Volume 35 March - May Volume 34 January - February Volume 33 September - October Volume 32 May - August Volume 31 January - April Volume 30 October - December Volume 29 August - September Volume 28 May - July Volume 27 January - April Volume 26 August - December Volume 25 May - July Volume 24 November - March Volume 23 August - November Volume 22 January - May Volume 21 September - December Volume 20 April - August Volume 19 January - March Volume 18 August - December Volume 17 March - July Volume 16 November - March Volume 15 June - October Volume 14 December - June Volume 13 July - November Volume 12 January - June Volume 11 June - December Volume 10 January - August Volume 9 August - December Volume 8 April - July Volume 7 January - November Volume 6 July - October Volume 5 February - May Volume 4 July - December Volume 3 February - May Volume 2 August - November Volume 1 February - June Impact Factor 1.
Continue reading To view the rest of this content please follow the download PDF link above. Over 10 million scientific documents at your fingertips. Other Sites Springer. Part of Springer Nature. A cross-cultural study of predictors of self-handicapping in university students. Personality and Individual Differences, 39 , Fontaine, R. Judgement of blame in Alzheimer's disease sufferers.
Advocacy and Objectivity in Science | Management Science
Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 11 4 , - Watson, A. Personality differences in high risk sports amateurs and instructors. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 99 , Child Study Journal, 32 4 , Overconfidence: Feedback and item difficulty effects. Personality and Individual Differences, 23 1 , British Journal of Psychology, 87 , Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
- Women writers in Renaissance England : an annotated anthology.
- To View More...;
- Brain Injury - Pathogenesis, Monitoring, Rcvy., and Mgmt..
- Login to your account.
- Qualified Visitor Traffic for Your Law Firm.
- CCNA Exam Cram™ 2 (Exams 640-821, 640-811, 640-801).
- The Africa Multi-Country AIDS Program 2000-2006: Results of the World Banks Response to a Development Crisis.
To buy a copy of this essential and easy to use book go to your local bookshop or order it through Amazon. There are further details on the book's website , where you can download datasets etc. Rationality and backward induction in Centipede games.
Galbraith, E. Over Eds. London: Routledge.
Multi-heuristic strategy choice: Response to Krueger. Psychological Inquiry, 23, Collective rationality, team reasoning, and focal points. Aktan Ed. Ambiguous games and strategic ambiguity aversion. Kokinov Ed.
- The Psychology of Abilities, Competencies, and Expertise.
- Dynamics of Human Gait.
- Researcher biography.
- Demystifying Talent Management: A Critical Approach to the Realities of Talent.
Sofia: NBU Press. Not immune to media messages. The Psychologist, 18 1 , The Psychologist, 17 6 , If at first you succeed: Predicting school and career success. The Psychologist, 17 8 , Overconfidence in human judgement. Thesis, University of Leicester. Evidence for the Confidence Heuristic in common-interest games with asymmetric information.
Persuading with confidence: Evidence for the Confidence Heuristic.
- Advocacy and Objectivity in Science.
- Karl Deisseroth, M.D., Ph.D.!
- Electrical Safety Handbook, 4th Edition;
- Change Password.
Social comparisons and academic self-confidence. Protocol analysis reveals promiscuous reasoning in common interest games. Protocol analysis reveals promiscuous reasoning in dyadic coordination games. A re Japanese people more trusting and cooperative than Europeans? Evidence from centipede games with commitment-enhancing tools. Extending the investigation of different models of strategic thinking.
Wow, I underestimated the good nature and of humanity of people! Cooperative behaviour in experimental games: Qualitative methods speak volumes.
Invited speaker, Kingston University, March 25, Learning to coordinate without awareness. Verbal protocol analysis of strategic choices in static and dynamic dyadic games. Incentives and reasoning in experimental games. Rationality in Centipede games. Cultural differences in life and death decision making.
Cultural differences in real-life and hypothetical trolley problems. Internal seminar, University of Leicester, January 21, Team reasoning versus Nash equilibrium: Experimental evidence. Explaining Strategic Coordination.
Confidence and its consequences in communication and persuasion. Your money or your life: Moral judgments in trolley problems with small financial incentives. European Society for Philosophy and Psychology, August , Your money or your life: Varying the outcomes in trolley problems. Investigating the effects of framing in trolley problems. Keynote speaker. Hogan, R. Payment incentives and advice giving motivation. Gold, N, Colman, A.
Judgements in trolley problems. Cooperation without awareness and decisions from experience in minimal social situations. Gill, P. Whether it is reality or imaginary, people are still spurred on by their previously sunk costs. Why are optimists less scared of ambiguity? Internal seminar, University of Leicester 13th October Confidence and communication in an E-FIT identification task. Knowing what other people know: Implications for the confidence heuristic. Ambiguous games and strategic ambiguity aversion: Experimental evidence. Testing the confidence heuristic: Are confident communicators more persuasive?
Effects of positive biases on decisions to enter a competitive market. Strategic ambiguity aversion. Asymmetric dominance effects in games. Proceedings of the British Psychological Society, 13 2 , Asymmetric dominance and confidence in strategic interaction. Proceedings of the British Psychological Society,13 2 , Individual differences in the influence of confidence: The effects of need for cognition and need for closure.
Exploring confidence. University of Wolverhampton 3rd November Asymmetric dominance and confidence in mixed-motive dyadic games. Effects of positive biases on market entry. The influence of speech confidence on choice and decision confidence. Proceedings of the British Psychological Society,10, Communicating confidence. Invited talk presented at the University of Reading 20th June Interpersonal perceptions of confidence.wikbud.eu/wp-content/2019-02-19/4456.php
Brain Structure and Function
Invited talk presented at the University of Hertfordshire. The effects of feedback and gender on overconfidence [Abstract]. Proceedings of the British Psychological Society, 3, Base rates and the overconfidence effect [Abstract]. Proceedings of the British Psychological Society, 1, Leicester Judgment and Decision Making Group. JDM Lab. The University of Leicester is committed to equal access to our facilities. Personal tools Web Editor Log in. Search Site only in current section.